The Russian Revolution
Revolution and its
significance
‘the forcible overthrow of a government or
social order, in favour of another’
In Marxist terms, ‘replacement of one ruling
class by another’
(Oxford English Dictionary)
The Russian Revolution was driven by a system
of ideas (socialist ideology), and facilitated by World War One. The revolution
helped to shape the course of twentieth century world history
Russia before the
revolution
Russia covers one sixth of the world’s land
surface, stretching from Germany in the west to Japan in the east. Economically
and politically it was behind Europe, even literally: It used the Julian
calendar for 400 years longer than western Europe necessitating the elimination
of 13 days of February 1918 to catch up, when the Gregorian calendar was adopted
after the revolution.
The Russian empire was the largest land-empire
in the world. It contained a population of roughly 125 million, which included
more than 100 different nationalities, of which the dominant group were the
Slavs. A great majority of the population, about 80%, were peasants.
Pre-revolutionary
politics
The Russian emperor was called the Tsar, a word
deriving from Caesar, leader of Roman empire. The Romanov dynasty had ruled
since 1612 and Nicholas II had been Tsar from 1894 to 1917. The Nineteenth
century had been one of resisting the great changes of Western Europe, yet
being fascinated by them. There was a growing sense that Russia needed to
modernise to protect itself.
Economic change in
late 19th Century
Alexander II, who ruled from 1855-1881, fostered
modern economic development: railways, exports of wheat and early industry from
the 1860s. This economic openness stimulated intellectual openness to Western
European ideas. There became a tension between ‘westernizers’ and ‘slavophiles’
and the growth of political discussion met with repression.
The 1870s saw the rise of underground groups,
often led by Marxists, and the murder of Alexander II in 1881.
Effects of early industrialisation
Alexander III (1881-1894) saw western influence
as damaging to autocracy, but he needed military strength, because he was
determined to make Russia industrially independent from Europe. His industrial
development programme included the Trans Siberian Railway. This programme
continued under Nicholas II (1894-1917), but insulation from the west cannot
stop rising tide of dissenting political ideas.
Rising political
dissent
Russian Social Democratic Workers Party (1898)
believed in a two stage revolution:
Vladimir Lenin(1870-1924) felt Russia’s conditions were special, and
that revolution there should skip the democratic phase and go straight to full
socialism.
Bolsheviks and
Mensheviks
Radical opposition to autocracy in Russia took
two main forms from Worker’s Party Congress in 1903:
A milder form of dissent was
liberal-constitutional. They wanted a parliament to limit tsar’s power. In 1905
Nicholas II allowed creation of a DUMA, a parliament, but it is short-lived.
Russia and World War I
War put the Russian society and economy under
immense pressure. Economic and military difficulties were exacerbated by the decline
of the royal image.
The February
Revolution
This was the fall of autocracy. War conditions
eroded Russian’s fabric through hardship. Yet war needs brought workers
together and gave them more power. Liberals managed to re-institute the Duma,
but the Tsar often overrode it. In January 1917, there was widespread unrest in
Petrograd (new name for St Petersburg) and in February 1917, the tsar
abdicated and a provisional government took over. The Mensheviks established a
SOVIET (council) of Workers and Soldiers. The two organisations shared power.
The October
Revolution, 1917
Lenin returned from exile in Switzerland in
October 1917 and rallied the Bolsheviks. Their slogan was: ‘Peace, land,
bread’. They tried to appeal to both workers and peasants, both hammer and
sickle. On the night of 24 October, Bolshevik forces, led by Leon Trotsky,
stormed the Winter Palace, the seat of the provisional government, and seized
power.
The significance of this is that they created
an alternative model of development, which ultimately lead to the bipolar world
of the Cold War and the arms race. This had the immediate legacy however of
domestic isolation and economic stagnation.